The Nano Bang Theory

Dear Stephan,
Warm regards !!
This letter is the result of the under currents of my anxity about "The Grand Design"
What I have understood from the interpretations and elaborations available on the net is you have established that the Big Bang can be explained by some remix of the fundamentals of the Newtonian Physics and Einstines Thories of relativity. The science necessary to proove Auto Creation is sufficient and abduntly ready for it, according to you.
The implication of this , you extrapolated is, there is no scope or limitation or reason necessorily be alloted or reserved or creditable for the existance of the God.

I feel,this is really a better preposition for understaning both, the Science and the God.

The belivers seem to be disturbed as they think Science is now enchroching the domain of unquestionable undisputable belif of Gods existance.

Atheist seem to got inspired by this divine enlightenment in their support.

I realised that I am both. An atheist and a beliver.
Just as when I see my Voters card, I feel I m an Indian. When I look at Jupiter and its 4 moons thru my modern telescope, I feel I belong to the race of Galileo.
When I think up to Big Bang, I feel I belong to race of Einstine and Hawking. The moment I try to see beyond it, I used to become a beliver.
Now, "The Grand Design" seems to be streching our scientific instincts and pushing the God on another back foot.

The analysis essential is as under :
Let the Big Bang be a Property created by the Science.
Let the Space, Time, Mass, Energy all belong to the Science.

Now, let us ask Science.
Dear Science, you have all the material, time, space and energy of your own .
Please organise it and creat hard wear of a unicelluler Protozoa.
Let some Scientific lab fabricate a primary cell. Let us presume that a perfect cell is ready.
Now, my so dear Science, can you put LIFE in it ? Can you make it alive ?

Obviously , as on day, the answer is NO.

So, science can creat universe but not add life.

And if science cannt do it, God must be given due credit untill its prooved contarary.

The birth and deaths of living organisms are the proofs, reasons, limitations and scope responsible to have belif in concept of God. So, Stephan, Every very birth and every death is a Nano Bang.

Big Bang is of no significance in absence of the Nano Bangs.

May God bless you, our science and Human Race to make this wonderful planet a planet of Joy. And let the Nano Bangs exist and carry on self repeating as usual.

Thanks !!

Sandeep

The Autoverse : Science + Commerce = Art

Last week, I simply enjoyed going to sleep with post 'Enlightenment' moments full of satisfaction after uploading the article : 'Nobel not enough : Ages old mystery resolved' (which you will find below this article)
Next morning, as I was going thru the news paper, a surprise gently sat on my mind like a butterfly lands on the tender flower bursting with smell of the nectar. As if just as we remember and try to rehearse a melodious song in our mind and the next moment sound of same song faintly gliding in the air reaches our ear.
Now that the eternal quest who was first, the Egg or the Hen resolved in my mind , as if it was the next stanza of the same song , the news about Stephan Hawking's soon to be released book titled 'The Grand Design ' landed on my mind.

Two days are gone and I am beginning to feel the subtleness of the Butterfly landed on my mind, the essence of the human reasoning about the thoughts about the origin and the existence of the universe.

I am looking forward to the arrival of the book and felt very happy to know that Prof. Murtza Ali has already booked a copy for his personal collection.

As the websites and pre launch reviews are describing , Stephan has ruled out the idea of requiring a Creator for the universe.
Now, this is an equally age old and many times discussed point.
But since Stephan is saying, it makes all the difference.
Stephan attributes the Big Bang to the fundamentals of science laid down by Newton.
1.
Creation without Creator : Logical Immpossibility to which Stephan is the challenger.
2.
Mass and Energy relation is well understood. E = mc2.
3.
Time and Space relationship has no conversion formula yet.
4.
Explanation for Spontaneous creation without any creator, I call it AUTOVERSE and not Universe because of Big Bang is to be expected in The Grand Design.
5.
We know What is Science and How it exists and also know that it exists without exception ,so we consider it as Universal but we don't know WHY it exists.
We know it runs on Laws of Gravity, but dont know Why so and why things dont obey any other formula other than G* Mm upon R square?
6.
Can there be a world where , the ruling formula is G *R square upon Mm ? I call it a repulsive or reverse gravity world.

7.
Like theres a positive and negative in Electricity, Magnetisum, why its not so in Gravity , Space And Time ?

8.
Now, God seems threatened by the chaos n mess created by Humans.These days, He must be cursing himself n singing freqently " Kya mere man me samaayee..Kahe ko ye duniya banaa yee.." So , He has, spontenously, transormed a Scientist in to his Advocate and shrugging off the responsibility thinking, ITs beyond his control Now and if theres no creator, nobody can be accused.
Obviously, God wants to disown the Hell we made out of the Heaven he gave us and weeps for being branded and publicised Him as the "Most Wanted ".
I m sure, the idea to make Stephen the Advocate was solicitated to him by non other than The Godess, who disliked' the state of unrest '( of the God)I haven no doubts, God was forced to creat Universe at the behaste of the Godess , the external unbalanced force.,transforming the State of Rest of the God. Both of them together enjoyed the 'Uniform motion'. Untill the moment (of inertia ) Humans generated, got them unbearable and miserable. Thus Stephen,the Best Scientist was trasformed into the Best Advocate.
9.
We yet dont know, as yet the book is not published, if Stephan just disbelives the God and The Godess equally. And he has uttered nothing about Her. If God has +ve sign then , Godess has to be - ve.
10.
The peace and Morals cannt stand on earth if God and Godess concepts are negated.
11.
Newton was a Strong beliver in God but never tried to Bribe or appease him to earn fortune.
12.
Theres a word "pricewall" on the articles about Grand Design on the internet.I have not understood it yet.
But I guess there exist a +ve and a -ve Commerce around the Science behind The Grand Design, and That is an ART .

Nobel is not Enough :Ages old mystry solved.

Humans are so much competative that they not only try to compete and beat other humans but every species of plant and animal kingdom.
They even don't spare the mother nature and think they are entrusted with responsibility of governing it.
This too, is backed up and cooked up with built in belife, that majority of us do ,what ever, is as per Will of the Creator,n the supplyer of the Intellact, the Buddhi, I.E. The God.

By creating Cloaning technology, the Humans have challenged the Creator.

But yet there was no answer to the age old unanswered Question of the human race : Who was first to come: The Egg or the Hen ?

Yesterday midnight, exactly at 12 .00
The answer was strucked by me.

******************
The Egg and The Hen were created simulteneously.
******************

Reasons

1.
Unlike humans, who requier crutches of science to develop any thing, The God don't requier any thing to start with.He is the master of Multi Generating. He don't have binding to work in competative manner.. i.e. who , what to be First.. Second.. Third.. and don't requier any sequence for any thing.
2.
The one who can creat an Egg out of nothing, can creat a Hen out of same nothing , vise versa .
3.
The Hen and Egg were not only created undoubtedly simulteneously, but designed to work in tandem. The Egg was a Male and It needed to be hatched.
4.
Although the Hen cared for the Egg, she was just a baby sitter,not its Mom.
5.
Its perfectly Moral to marry your baby sitter to start the Gen Next.
6.
Those who think the Egg was a Female, are trying to compete with me. Why didn't they ever, even once ,asked First Roost or First Egg ?